- risk identification,
management and response strategy impacts every area of the project
management life cycle
- everyone is responsible
for identifying risks
- risk has one or more
causes and has one or more impacts
- risk = uncertainty;
risk management: increase the probability of project success by
minimizing/eliminating negative risks (threats) and increasing positive
events (opportunities)
- risk attitudes (EEF): risk
appetite (willingness to take risks for rewards), tolerance for
risk (risk tolerant or risk averse), risk threshold (level beyond
which the org refuses to tolerate risks and may change its response)
- pure (insurable) risk vs business risk (can
be +ve or -ve)
- known risks that cannot
be dealt with proactively (active acceptance) should be assigned a
contingency reserve or if the known risks cannot be analyzed,
just wait for its happening and implement workaround (passive acceptance)
Processes
|
Inputs
|
Tools & Techniques
|
Output
|
Plan Risk Management
|
Project Management Plan
Project Charter Stakeholder Register Enterprise Environment Factors Organization Process Assets |
Analytical Techniques
Expert Judgment Meetings |
Risk Management Plan
|
Identify Risks
|
Risk Management Plan
Cost Management Plan Schedule Management Plan Quality Management Plan HR Management Plan Scope Baseline Activity Cost Estimates Activity Duration Estimates Stakeholder Register Project Documents Procurement Documents Enterprise Environment Factors Organization Process Assets |
Documentation Reviews
Information Gathering Techniques Checklist Analysis Assumptions Analysis Diagramming Techniques SWOT Analysis Expert Judgment |
Risk Register
|
Perform Qualitative Risk
Analysis
|
Risk Management Plan
Scope Statement Risk Register Enterprise Environment Factors Organization Process Assets |
Risk Probability and Impact Assessment
Probability and Impact Matrix Risk Data Quality Assessment Risk Categorization Risk Urgency Assessment Expert Judgment |
Project Documents Updates
|
Perform Quantitative Risk
Analysis
|
Risk Management Plan
Cost Management Plan Schedule Management Plan Risk Register Enterprise Environment Factors Organization Process Assets |
Data Gathering and Representation Techniques
Quantitative Risk Analysis and Modeling Techniques Expert Judgment |
Project Documents Updates
|
Plan Risk Responses
|
Risk Management Plan
Risk Register |
Strategies for Negative Risk (Threats)
Strategies for Positive Risk (Opportunities) Contingent Response Strategies Expert Judgment |
PM Plan Updates
Project Documents Updates |
Control Risks
|
PM Plan
Risk Register Work Performance Data Work Performance Reports |
Risk Reassessment
Risk Audits Variance and Trend Analysis Technical Performance Measurement Reserve Analysis Meetings |
Work Performance Info
Change Requests PM Plan Update Project Document Updates OPA Updates |
Plan
Risk Management
- define and provide resources and time to perform risk
management, including: methodology, roles and responsibilities, budget,
timing (when and how often), risk categories (e.g. RBS), definitions,
stakeholder tolerances (a EEF), reporting and tracking
- performed at project initiation and early in the Planning
process
- failure to address risks early on can ultimately be more
costly
- analytical techniques include stakeholder risk profile
analysis, strategic risk scoring sheets
- a risk breakdown structure (RBS) (included in the PM
Plan) – risks grouped by categories and occurring areas
- key risk categories: scope creep, inherent schedule flaws,
employee turnover, specification breakdown (conflicts in deliverable
specifications), poor productivity
Identify
Risks
- determine all risks affecting the project
- information-gathering techniques: brainstorming, delphi
technique [a panel of independent experts, maintain anonymity, use
questionnaire, encourage open critique], root cause analysis
[performed after an event to gain understanding to prevent similar
events from occurring], expert interviewing, SWOT analysis
- root cause analysis: safety-based (prevent accidents),
production-based, process-based (include business process), failure-based,
systems-based (all above)
- root cause analysis tools: FMEA, Pareto Analysis, Bayesian
Inference (conditional probability), Ishikawa Diagrams, Kepner-Tregoe
- Monte Carlo analysis can identify points of schedule risks
- Influence Diagram
- graphical representations of situations showing causal influences,
time ordering of events, and other relationships among variables and
outcomes.
- Risk Register (typically
not including the risk reserve)
- The Risk Register may include a risk statement
- any risk with a probability of >70% is an issue (to
be dealt with proactively and recorded in the issue log)
Perform
Qualitative Risk Analysis
- prioritizing risks for further analysis/action and identify
high priority risks
- need to identify bias and correct it (e.g. risk attitude of
the stakeholders)
- qualitative risk assessment matrix (format described in the Risk Management Plan)
- update to risk register and other related documents
- risk register update are output of Perform Qualitative Risk
Analysis, Perform Quantitative Analysis, Plan Risk Responses and Monitor
& Control Risks
- the scope baseline is used to understand whether the project
is a recurrent type or a state-of-the-art type (more risks)
- risks requiring near-term responses are more urgent to
address
Perform
Quantitative Risk Analysis
- the cost, schedule and risk management plan contains
guidelines on establishing and managing risks
- involves mathematical modeling for forecasts and trend
analysis
- data gathering and representation techniques: interviewing, probability
distributions [normal distribution (bell shaped curve)],
- sensitivity analysis (using the tornado diagram as presentation)
for determining the risks that have the most impact on the project
- Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)
- FMEA for manufactured product or where risk may be
undetectable, Risk Priority Number (RPN) = severity (1-10) x occurrence
([0.07%] 1-10 [20%]) X detectability (1-10 [undetectable]), also a non-proprietary
approach for risk management
- Expected Value / Expected Monetary Value (EMV),
probability x impact (cost/effort lost), opportunities (+ve values),
threats (-ve values)
- Monte Carlo Analysis – by running simulations many times over in order to
calculate those same probabilities heuristically just like actually
playing and recording your results in a real casino situation, ‘S’ curve
(cumulative distribution) will result, may use PERT/triangular
distribution to model data, may use thousands of data points (a random
variable), for budget/schedule analysis
- Decision Tree Analysis – another form of EMV, branching: decision squares (decision
branch – options), circles (uncertainty branch – possible outcomes)
Plan
Risk Responses
- plan response to enhance opportunities and reduce threats
- each risk is owned by a responsible person
- the watch list is the list of low priority risks items
in the risk register
- a fallback plan will be used if 1) risk response not
effective, 2) accepted risk occurs
- risk strategies: 1) prevent risk, 2) response to risk, 3)
reduce risk, 4) promote opportunities, 5) fallback if risk response fails
- negative risk strategies: eliminate/avoid (not to
use, extend the schedule), transfer (outsource, warranty,
insurance), mitigate (reduce the risk by more testing/precautionary
actions/redundancy), accept (passive – do nothing or active
– contingency)
- positive risk strategies: exploit (ensure
opportunity by using internal resources e.g. reduce cost/use of top
talents/new tech), share (contractor with specialized skills,
joint venture), enhance (increase likelihood / impact e.g.
fast-tracking, add resources etc.), accept
- passive risk acceptance to be dealt with when the risk occurs
- Contingency Plan (contingent response strategies) (plan A) are developed for specific risk (when you have
accepted a risk) with certain triggers vs Fallback Plan (plan B)
- Residual Risks – risks
remains after the risk response strategy was implemented, may be
identified in the planning process (may subject to contingency/fallback
planning) They don’t need any further analysis because you have already
planned the most complete response strategy you know in dealing with the
risk that came before them.
- Secondary Risks –
risk arises when the risk response strategy was implemented
- Contingency Reserve: known unknowns (determined risk), part of
cost baseline
- Management Reserve: unknown unknowns (discovery risk), part of
project budget
- The Risk Register is now completed with: risks and
descriptions, triggers, response strategy, persons responsible, results
from qualitative and quantitative analysis, residual and secondary risks,
contingency and fallback, risk budget/time
Control
Risks
- when the above risk planning processes have been performed
with due diligence, the project is said to have a low risk profile
- to check if assumptions are still valid, procedures are
being followed and any deviance
- to identify new risks and evaluate effectiveness of
risk response plan
- any need to adjust contingency and management reserves
- to re-assess the individual risk response strategies to see if
they are effective
- risk audits deal with effectiveness of risk response and the
risk management process
- risk audits are usually performed by experts outside project
team for the whole risk management process
- reserve analysis and fund for contingencies apply only
to the specific risks on the project for which they were set aside
- workaround: when no
contingency plan exists, executed on-the-fly to address unplanned
events – still need to pass through normal change control if change
requests are needed
- determine the workaround is performed in control risks
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be the first to comment..